Apple’s industrial design team has reportedly spent the past year exploring an Apple Watch overhaul big enough to include a version with no screen at all. That’s the headline from Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman, published August 9, 2026 in his Power On newsletter — and it lands at a strange moment for this site specifically. We’ve spent the last month covering exactly this category. Garmin CIRQA. The Fitbit Air. Galaxy Watch 9 undercutting WHOOP’s subscription. Now, apparently, Apple wants in.

Don’t reach for your wallet. Nothing here ships this year, and Gurman is explicit that a real redesign is a multi-year project. But the report is worth taking seriously for one reason that has nothing to do with industrial design: the executive steering Apple’s health strategy reportedly wears the exact competitors he’d be trying to beat.

Quick Verdict

	What’s Reported
Source	Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman, Power On newsletter, Aug 9, 2026
What’s under consideration	Screenless fitness tracker, round-display Apple Watch, new tiers above Ultra and below SE
Timeline	Not this year — Gurman calls it unlikely before 2026 ends
Scale of the effort	Compared to the iPhone’s move toward foldables
Key figure	Eddy Cue, who now runs Apple’s health division and reportedly uses both WHOOP and Oura personally
Context	Follows February 2026’s shelving of Project Mulberry, Apple’s AI health-coaching push

Best for: Anyone tracking whether Apple eventually enters the screenless recovery category this site has covered all summer. Skip if: You’re shopping for a wearable right now — there is nothing to buy here, only a direction.

What Gurman’s Report Actually Says

Here’s the featured-snippet version, since this is what people are actually going to search for:

1. A screenless fitness tracker — built to compete directly with WHOOP, Oura, and Fitbit Air rather than function as a smartwatch.
2. A round-screen Apple Watch — explored internally, but Gurman says it’s unlikely to actually reach production.
3. New premium tiers above Ultra — additional high-end models beyond the current Ultra and Hermès lineup.
4. More affordable tiers below SE — a cheaper entry point than exists today.
5. A broader Health app overhaul — tied to Apple’s push to make Siri and its health tools more AI-driven.

None of this is confirmed product. It’s Gurman’s characterization of what Apple’s industrial design team has been evaluating over roughly the last year, and by his own account nothing has been finalized. MacRumors’ writeup of the same report frames it similarly — a lot of directions on the table, no committed roadmap.

The Eddy Cue Detail That Actually Explains This

Here’s the part that makes the rest of the report worth reading past the headline. Eddy Cue, who now oversees Apple’s health efforts, reportedly uses both WHOOP and Oura himself. Not evaluates them in a lab. Wears them.

That’s a genuinely strange thing for the executive in charge of Apple’s health strategy to be doing, and it’s not the first signal from Cue pointing this direction. Back in February, Cue was the one who shelved Project Mulberry, Apple’s planned AI health-coaching subscription, after concluding it didn’t meet the bar Oura and WHOOP had already set. We covered that decision as a strange kind of gift to Apple’s competitors — the executive running Apple’s health division publicly conceding that outside products were better than what Apple was about to ship.

Now the same executive is apparently pushing internally to close that gap by building something closer to what he already wears on his own wrist. Entrepreneur’s reporting on Cue’s device habits put it about as directly as a headline can: Apple’s top health executive uses a WHOOP. Whether that’s embarrassing or refreshingly honest depends on how charitable you’re feeling toward Apple this week. Either way, it’s a more useful signal than the usual “sources familiar with the matter” rumor, because it tells you what the person actually making the call finds worth imitating.

Don’t Expect This Before 2026 Ends

Gurman is unusually blunt about the timeline here, and it’s worth taking him at his word rather than assuming an announcement is imminent. A screenless Apple Watch isn’t happening before this year is out. September’s event is expected to bring a foldable iPhone and otherwise-routine, mostly performance-focused updates to Series 12 and Ultra 4 — nothing that resembles the screenless direction described here.

Worth flagging since we covered it ourselves: that’s a step down from where the Ultra 4 rumor sat back in April, when a watchOS code leak pointed to Touch ID and a doubled sensor array landing this fall. Gurman’s more recent reporting pushes that bigger redesign — Touch ID included — out to 2027 or later, with this September’s Ultra 4 landing as a faster-chip, better-battery update rather than the generational leap the spring leaks suggested.

The comparison Gurman draws is the useful data point: he puts this redesign on the same scale as the iPhone’s move toward foldables. That’s not a feature update. That’s a multi-year platform shift, the kind of thing that gets explored, shelved, revived, and argued about internally for years before it ships — if it ships at all. Round-display Apple Watches have reportedly come up in these discussions too, and Gurman thinks that direction specifically is unlikely to make it to market. Take the whole report as a snapshot of what’s being debated inside Apple, not a product roadmap with dates attached.

Why This Lands Differently Given What We’ve Covered This Month

Line this report up against the run of posts we’ve published since mid-July and a pattern gets hard to ignore. Garmin went screenless with CIRQA. Google went screenless with the Fitbit Air. Samsung took the opposite approach with the Galaxy Watch 9, keeping the screen but bundling WHOOP-style recovery scoring in for free. Every major watchmaker that isn’t Apple has spent this summer picking a side in the “beat WHOOP on price or beat it on form factor” fight.

Apple sat all of it out — publicly, anyway. What this report suggests is that internally, Apple hasn’t been sitting still at all. It’s been watching the same category we’ve been covering and asking whether it needs a screenless product of its own. That’s a different posture than “Apple doesn’t care about this market.” It’s closer to “Apple is late to this market and knows it,” which tracks with Cue’s own assessment back in February that Apple’s AI coaching wasn’t good enough to ship against Oura and WHOOP.

There’s also a version of the WHOOP alternatives roundup we ran in July worth revisiting here. The entire premise of that piece was that WHOOP’s annual subscription had created an opening for exactly this kind of no-subscription, hardware-first competitor. We didn’t put Apple on that list because Apple wasn’t in this fight yet. If this report holds up over the next couple of years, that list gets a new entrant with a two-billion-device installed base behind it.

What It Would Mean for Oura and WHOOP

If Apple genuinely ships a screenless tracker — and that’s a real “if,” given the timeline — the competitive math changes for both companies, but not identically.

For WHOOP, the threat is more direct. Apple’s rumored screenless device is explicitly being positioned against exactly what WHOOP does: passive, screen-free recovery and strain tracking. WHOOP has spent years building a subscription business on the idea that the hardware is basically free and the data is the product. An Apple entrant selling the hardware once, backed by an ecosystem WHOOP will never match, is a genuinely different kind of pressure than Garmin CIRQA or Fitbit Air applied this summer — those are still niche players by comparison to what a first-party Apple product could reach.

Oura’s position is a little more insulated, at least for now. Round screens aside, nothing in this report describes Apple building a ring, and the ring form factor is a meaningfully different hardware bet than a wrist band. Oura’s compliance advantage — people tolerate a ring overnight more easily than a watch — doesn’t automatically transfer to whatever Apple builds. But the AI health layer Apple is reportedly planning around this hardware directly threatens the software side of Oura’s pitch, the same software layer Project Mulberry was originally built to compete with before Cue killed it.

Who Should Care

Current WHOOP or Oura subscribers: Nothing changes for you today. This is a multi-year rumor about a product category, not a shipping device. Keep making your subscription decision based on what exists now, not what Apple might build in 2027 or later.

Apple Watch owners debating an upgrade: If you’re waiting to see whether Apple builds something screenless before buying, you’re in for a long wait. Buy for what exists — the Ultra 4 decision we’ve already covered — not for a redesign Gurman himself says is unlikely before 2026 ends and probably years further out than that.

Anyone following the no-subscription recovery wave: This is the report to bookmark. Every other entrant we’ve covered this summer — CIRQA, Fitbit Air, Galaxy Watch 9 — came from a company that already had reason to compete with WHOOP. Apple didn’t, until its own health chief apparently decided its home-built products weren’t good enough and started wearing the competition instead.

The Bottom Line

The product story here is thin — screenless trackers, round screens, new price tiers, all explored, none confirmed, none coming this year. What’s not thin is the signal underneath it. The executive running Apple’s health division reportedly doesn’t reach for an Apple Watch when he wants real recovery data. He reaches for WHOOP and Oura, the same two products his own team cited in February as the reason Apple’s AI coaching wasn’t ready to ship.

That’s the second time in six months Apple’s health leadership has effectively told the market that outside products are setting the bar. First it was Project Mulberry getting shelved because it couldn’t match Oura and WHOOP. Now it’s a redesign effort reportedly shaped by an executive who uses both. Neither is a product you can buy. Both are Apple telling on itself.

---

Reporting based on Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman writing in the August 9, 2026 edition of Power On, cross-referenced with MacRumors’ and Entrepreneur’s coverage of the same report. No product, timeline, or pricing described here is confirmed by Apple. Details reflect reporting available as of publication date and are subject to change.